There are pros and cons with all things in life, including the manner in which to handle the economy. While I personally believe in personal responsibility, I do question if it is practical in today's world? After all, people will do whatever you allow them to do; I have found this to be true time and again in all aspects of life. Irrespective of your personal beliefs on this matter, the mortgage/real estate debacle has certainly fueled the fire for those who argue that we need bigger government to oversee the economy.
What say you? In principle, a free economy wins the day. But what about in reality?

My educational background is in economics and generally speaking, I'm more for a hands off mentality when it comes to government regulation. That said, Government and government interdiction does have it's place. Even in a very conservative economic view the role of government is to provide those services that the free market either doesn't provide or doesn't provide in an adequate amount. The classic examples are roads and miliatary defense.
Regarding the mortgage meltdown I believe that this falls under this legitimate "role" of government in that the free markets obviously are not capable of providing an adequate amount of stability to the markets right now. Given a longer period of time, I'm sure that the free markets could and will work through this mess.
The question is, "At what cost to us all?"
In my opinion the cost of doing nothing is far too high to be an acceptable option. The government needs to step in and deal with this problem in a forthright manner. The current "half-thought out" steps that they are taking such as cutting the discount rate and the "stimulus" package are only making things worse!
Bob Mitchell
ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.
Bob: I agree with your assessment. I am a free market guy, but sometimes it comes at a huge price.
Millie: You nailed it on the head. You are exactly right about the "fraud equation".